GOLFTIME ROBOTEST DRIVER

I found the NV 65 results interesting in that the test showed significantly less carry for this shaft than any other. But the tendency was the same: Wouldn’t it make sense to use the BB 63? Great link — interesting results, but they don’t fit with what I’ve personally experienced for what it’s worth. Expert editorial reviews, breaking golf tour and industry news, what to play, how to play and where to play.

Uploader: Kajilabar
Date Added: 2 April 2011
File Size: 54.11 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 73413
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Great link — interesting results, but they don’t fit with what I’ve personally experienced for what it’s worth. So, all those who say it is better to err on the softer side, are certainly right.

Posted 16 September – I’ve forgotten my password. Posted 03 October – You gofltime have javascript disabled. I have been playing a Graffaloy Pro Launch Blue in stiff and I have found that it plays a touch too stiff and I get exactly the results the testing indicated, low ball flight and short carry.

GOLF TIME 4/2017

The first one shows the results of a driver shaft test. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at GolfWRX such as viewing all the images, interacting with members, access to all forums and eligiblility to win free giveaways.

  HITACHI HD44780U LCD DRIVER DOWNLOAD

It is a complicated procedure, but it explains, why some stiff shafts “play softer” than some regular shafts and why they feel completely different. Javascript Disabled Detected You currently have javascript disabled. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Several functions may not work. Mitsubishi recommend stiff for mph. Two more thoughts on the shaft test: It would be relatively easy to find ten robotfst with a swing speed of 90 mph who all required completely different shafts due to the way they load the shaft and how their swing influences the club head path rbotest the ball.

If the results are to be trusted though, it really seems as if I’d be better off with a regular shaft which surprises me.

Driver Shaft Test and Shaft Spec List – WRX Club Techs – GolfWRX

I would be very interested in the opinions of fitting experts on this forum, how good and helpful the test and the listing really are. Posted 15 September – It was done by a German company at golfftime flat outdoor range with a Trackman and a swing robot. So you can just look up which shafts might suit somebody with a mph sing speed, with a slow, medium or fast tempo. Hireko Modern Guide To Shaft Fitting Basically, they compare shafts gofltime their stiffness frequencythe relation between the butt stiffness and tip stiffness gklftime then put that in relation to the torque of the shaft.

  HP C310 LINUX DRIVER DOWNLOAD

Those numbers were very impressive. What’s not really surprising is the other result: GolfWRX – the world’s largest and best online golf community. How can a shaft influence “smash factor”?

And how can it be higher than 1. These tests are nice, but with little different results.

Posted 18 September – It is interesting because most shaft manufacturers recommend a stiff shaft for swing speeds between Posted 09 October – Posted 27 February – I found the NV 65 results interesting in that the test showed significantly less carry for this shaft than any other. Dividing the clubhead speed by the ball speed, the result for both Pro Launch Blue shafts that were tested is higher than 1.

I have several clubs with each. Expert editorial reviews, breaking golf tour and industry news, what to play, how to play and where to play.